Webster Griffin Tarpley je publicist, povjesničar, novinar, predavač i kritičar vanjske i unutrašnje politike SAD. On tvrdi kako je napad 11. rujna 2001. godine bio namješten od strane mreže vojne industrije i obavještajnih agancija. Tarpley opisuje model terorističkih organizacija kao mreže vojnih i obavještajnih institucija koje rade za privatni sektor i medije i stvaraju operacije pod lažnom zastavom u povijesno presudnim trenutcima. Također tvrdi da je globalno zagrijavanje ustvari prijevara… (prema Wikipediji). Na njegovoj web-stranici http://Tarpley.net čitamo između ostaloga u jednom nadasve plauzibilnom napisu i ovo:
“…CIA’s Wikileaks Limited Hangout Has Rationale for Toppling Norway’s Government
Thanks to document dumps by the CIA limited hangout subsidiary generally known as Wikileaks, an obvious path for using the Norwegian terror attacks as a rationale for overthrowing the current government has already been provided. Real or doctored State Department cables obligingly made available by Wikileaks portray the Norwegian government which NATO hates as a collection of bunglers and misfits, unable to take effective measures to safeguard the national security of the country.
Some of these tables have been published in the immediate wake of the terror attacks by the London Daily Telegraph, a newspaper reputedly close to NATO intelligence circles. According to this article, while ‘talking about an attempt by the Police Security Service (PST) to track one particular suspected Al Qaeda terror cell, a cable written by the US Ambassador to Norway, Barry White, describes [how Norwegian authorities] … refused the help of the UK authorities to put surveillance on a potential suspect and adds: “Not only will they not put their own resources on him…but they also just turned down the visiting UK intel service’s offer of two twelve-person surveillance teams.” The cable goes on to say the UK and US intelligence services analyzed coded conversation between terror suspects and decided it warranted surveillance. But, says the cable, “PST instead found a way to interpret the same translated coded conversation in a rosier, less threatening light, an interpretation which makes little sense to the US or UK.”’ A catalog of even the most recent failures and fiascos of the FBI and the CIA in the so-called Global War on Terror would help to put these hypocritical judgments into proper perspective, but it would also be too voluminous to be appended here.
Another damaging particular appears made to order for an attempt to blame the alleged bungling of the Norwegian government for the Oslo bomb attack: ‘The memo also reveals how, despite apparently having surveillance on the suspect, the PST lost track of bomb-making equipment which was being stored in an apartment after it was apparently removed without investigators’ noticing. The PST then failed to track one suspect for 14 days because the investigator assigned to him was called away on another job. The memo concludes: “The PST is in over its head…it simply cannot keep up.”’
Another State Department memo dished up by Wikileaks, supposedly written in 2007… adds: “The official police (PST) threat evaluation…states that international terror organizations are not a direct threat against Norway. A memo written in 2008 shows how the US felt that Norway was not awake to the possibility of a potential terrorist attack. The cable reads: “We repeatedly press Norwegian authorities to take terrorism seriously. We will seek to build on this momentum to fight the still-prevalent feeling that terrorism happens elsewhere, not in peaceful Norway.” And a cable written just last year adds: “The PST still viewed Denmark as more of a target than Norway, for reasons very specific to the cartoon controversy.”
The government of Norway needs to go on the offensive and establish the whole truth of what has just occurred. Otherwise, that government is likely to succumb to the internationally orchestrated campaign which the Wikileaks documents so clearly foreshadow.“
Jučer sam na stranici (www.NWO-Academy.com) objavio kako je bezpredmetno označavati Anders Behringa kršćaninom ili fundamentalističkim kršćaninom, jer je iz svega razvidno da on to nije. Kako je to napose razvidno iz njegova napisa “European Declaration of Independence”, Wikileaks.hr objavljuje taj text u cijelosti jer još nije lako dostupan zbog zenzure (navodno, bolje ljude ostaviti u neznanju i otvoriti širom vrata svakakvim naklapanjima, pa ostati politički korektan, nego uzvjerovati u zdrav razum čitatelja i njihovu vlastitu sposobnost prosuđivanja). Izgleda kao da je nekome potreban jedan nordijski terorist i jedna, nekakva “bjelačka” Al-qaida (Alex Jones), kako bi se velikog bata opunomoćilo za temeljit nadzor i našu zaštitu. Jedan slobodni zidar (mason trećeg stupnja) Anders Behring, može imati sve samo ne naklonost kršćanstvu. Nije dovoljno njegovo ponavljano samo spominjanje kršćanstva, jer ga on rabi u čisto razlikovnom i oporbenom (križari, templari) smislu prema islamu. Pri tolikoj neprozirnosti, nije ni čudo kako su ga već titulirali i pro-izraelskim nacistom!?